Judiciary

Filters
FILTERS
A system in which a judge can decide any case however he or she sees fit—where the outcome of the case depends not on the law but on the judge assigned to the case—puts everyone’s freedom at risk. It is the role of a judge to apply the law as written, not as he or she wishes it had been written.
Judiciary

IWF Storyteller Jennifer Barela Opposes the Nomination of Judge Sarah Netburn

Jennifer Barela | Letters
Judiciary

IWF Storyteller Alissa Kamholz Opposes the Nomination of Judge Sarah Netburn

Alissa Kamholz | Letters
Judiciary

IWF Storyteller Evelyn Valiente Opposes the Nomination of Judge Sarah Netburn

Evelyn Valiente | Letters
Judiciary

IWF Ambassador and Woman II Woman Founder Opposes the Nomination of Judge Sarah Netburn

Amie Ichikawa | Letters
Judiciary

Calls for ‘Ethics Reform’ Are Disingenuous and Dangerous

May Mailman | Op-Ed
Judiciary

Justices on Both Sides Reject Modern Civil Asset Forfeiture

Jill Jacobson | Op-Ed
Judiciary

IWLC Opposes the Nomination of Judge Sarah Netburn

May Mailman | Letters
Judiciary

IWF Opposes the Nomination of Judge Sarah Netburn

Carrie Lukas | Letters
Judiciary

Lawyers and Big Tech spend your money on left-wing causes

Anna St. John | Op-Ed
Judiciary

At The Bar: They’re Baaaack . . . The Supreme Court Opens Its 2024 Term

Jennifer C. Braceras, Inez Feltscher Stepman & Anastasia Boden | At the Bar
Judiciary

The Constitution Protects ‘Harmful’ Speech

Rachel Chiu | Op-Ed
Judiciary

Jennifer Braceras – SCOTUS Term Roundup and Preserving the Legitimacy of the Court

Inez Feltscher Stepman & Jennifer C. Braceras | High Noon Podcast